October 19 this year marks the
30th anniversary of the gory
assassination of Dele Giwa, the first
Editor in Chief of Newswatch, Nigeria’s path-breaking newsmagazine. Dele’s life
was cynically shortened by the novel method of a parcel bomb that was delivered
to his house at No. 25 Talabi Street,
Ikeja, Lagos on Sunday October 19, 1986 at mid-day.
Since then a lot of water has passed
under the bridge. The matter has continued to be in the laser glare of the
public eye. Those who did the dirty job may have thought that killing the
famous journalist will be a quick job, quickly done and quickly forgotten. Yes,
it was quickly done but obviously not quickly forgotten: thirty years down the
road the matter is not dead. It is alive and well and not ready to die any time
soon.
Late Dele Giwa However, over the last
15 years or so a man who played a tangential,supervisory role in the matter, Chris
Omeben, has been doing his ineffectual best to mislead the public on the
matter by playing footsiewith the facts.
Mr. Omeben who retired as Deputy Inspector General of
Police in 1989 is now the Archbishop of Jesus Families Ministries. He will be
81 years old on October 27 this year.
With a frison
of surprise this man has been effing and
jeffing apparently championing
the cause of his sponsors but his sloppy analysis is not receiving a storm of
applause from the public. It is apparent that the public knows that this man is
a truth-shredder. While he has the intuitive freedom to lie we have the
obligatory duty to put the facts before the public, since he has been pointing
accusing fingers in various directions. These include Florence Ita
Giwa, Dele’s ex-wife, Kayode Soyinka, Newswatch London Bureau Chief at the
time and Dele’s colleagues, Ray Ekpu, Dan
Agbese and Yakubu
Mohammed. His flippant gyration
on the matter therefore deserves a multilateral response so that his
lies will not be inadvertenly validated and the hard earned reputations of
innocent people are not brought down by his swinging axe.
(1)Kayode Soyinka:
Kayode Soyinka was the London
Bureau Chief of Newswatch. He was in Lagos for an official business and lodged
at Dele’s residence. Omeben has sought, vainly, to pin the assassination
on him simply because he was in the study together with Dele when the parcel
bomb exploded. Omeben says he sent out people to locate him but he
could not be found. “We later learnt that he went out of the country through
Idi-Iroko.” This is a farrago of lies.
Here are the facts: Kayode
was sitting opposite Dele when his son Billy delivered the parcel to his
father. When the parcel exploded at Dele’s attempt to open it, Kayode
was thrown on the floor. His ears were damaged and he was hospitalized
at First Foundation Hospital in
Ikejawhere Dele was rushed to after the incident. For more than a
year Kayode’s ears were dysfunctional.
Mr.
Omeben says that Kayode
left the room where he and Dele were as soon as Billy Giwa
brought in the parcel. He says
Kayode stayed out until the
parcel exploded. “It was while he was there in an adjacent room that the parcel
detonated; the metal partition separating the
dinning room and the kitchen was
destroyed. Lies! Omeben thinks that since the two men were said to
have just had breakfast, the breakfast session was in the dinning
room. And dinning rooms
are more often than not near the
kitchen. This is pure conjecture. They had their breakfast in the study,
not in the dinning
room and the study was not near the
dinning room or kitchen.
Kayode was never in hiding. After the bomb explosion
which rendered Dele’s residence uninhabitable.
Kayode and members of Dele’s
family moved into Ray Ekpu’s
wing of the building. Dele and Ray lived in this twin duplex. Infact,
Kayode was interviewed by several newspapers during the
period that he was in Nigeria; he was
interviewed by the Police at least twice and he submitted written statements to
them; he attended Dele’s burial at
Ugbekpe Ekperi in Edo State along with other Newswatch
staff.
Mr.
Omeben has said that Newswatch
directors shielded Kayode from being arrested by the police. This is a
lie. Throughout the period of this incident
Kayode was available. He was not
a fugitive from justice. He was a victim of the dastardly act. If we
prevented Kayode from being arrested by the police (and we
deny it vehemently) why did the Police not arrest us for obstruction?
If
Kayode was considered a suspect
in the matter why have the Police not arrested him since then because criminal
cases are not time barred.Kayode has come to Nigeria very many times in the
past 30 years without the police accosting him. Twice, he contested elections
for the governorship of Ogun State, campaigning there for months on each
occasion. Why was he not arrested by the Police?
The allegation that Kayode
escaped from the country through the NADECO route at Idi
Iroko is nonsense. Kayode
left Nigeria through the
Murtala Muhammed International Airport on British Caledonian
Airways accompanied by his wife and children who had to join him in Nigeria
when they heard of the incident. This information can be crosschecked with the
various authorities at the Murtala Muhammed Airport.
Before Kayode
left Nigeria on Sunday November 16, 1986 the Police had come the day
before, that is Saturday November 15, 1986 asking him to make a statement on
his movement between the day of the bomb blast and the time of his discharge
from the hospital. He did. But curiously
and fully aware that Kayode had left Nigeria the day before the police
came on Monday November 17, 1986 to say they had some more questions for Kayode. A letter signed by A. Kaltungo, Deputy Commissioner of Police was
delivered to Ray Ekpu. The letter
asked Kayode to report to the Police on Wednesday November
19, 1986. Ray replied to the letter that same day informing the police (as if
they didn’t know) that Kayode had returned to London. He gave the
police Kayode’s London address and phone numbers. It is
elementary wisdom that no one could sit in a room where he knew a bomb was
going to explode except he is a suicide bomber. And Kayode
was not one. He had a wife and children and a flourishing career. His
demographics do not fit into a sensible analyst’s silhouette
of a suicide bomber.
For every crime there must be a
motive. Why would Kayode want to kill his Editor in Chief? If he
killed Dele he would never have become the next Editor in Chief of the magazine.
He would have had to kill Ray Ekpu,
Dan Agbese, Yakubu
Mohammed, Soji Akinrinade,
Nosa Igiebor, Dele Omotunde,
Onome Osifo Whisky and a few other senior editorial staff
to get to the Editor in Chief’s chair.
It is curious that a policeman who
retired as a Deputy Inspector General of Police does not know that a
murder allegation does not expire and
that even if Kayode lives in London, Interpol could have got him
to come to Nigeria and answer for the alleged crime if the Nigeria Police had
concrete information on his involvement.
(2)Newswatch Directors: Ray Ekpu, Dan
Agbese and YakubuMohammed. Mr. Omeben
has alleged a couple of times
that there was boardroom politics in Newswatch where the board members would
want to eliminate themselves. The external board members of Newswatch were all
successful businessmen who only invested in Newswatch because we the executive directors
Ray, Dan, Yakubu
were their friends. There was
nothing for them to fight for in Newswatch.
But Mr. Omeben
has mentioned the three of us a few times by namemaking allegations or
insinuations that tend to give the impression that we were suspects in the
case. This is a most uncharitable, wicked and despicable piece of defamation.
In the first place, we never had any crisis of notable dimension that could
have warranted the existence of a plot to kill our friend and business partner.
If we killed Dele what would we get? His Newswatch shares? We have our own.
His wife? We have our own. His children?
We have our own. The position of Editor in Chief? Most unlikely for four
reasons: (a) Each of the four of us had been editor of a newspaper or
two before we came together so the editorial chair did not offer such an
overwhelming attraction for any of us to
harbour the thought of physically
eliminating our friend and business partner (b) All the four of us were on the
same salary and allowances. No one earned higher and no one earned lower than
the other. (c) The positions in Newswatch at its inception were determined by Ray
and Yakubu. Both of them decided
that since Dele and Dan were unfairly treated in their last offices
in Concord and New Nigerian, it was wise to assert our confidence in the two of
them by offering them the positions of Editor in Chief and Managing Director
respectively. Ray and Yakubu opted to be called Executive Editors. It was
not a mark of anybody’s superiority or inferiority because we all took active
part in the editorial activities of the magazine and had equal shares (15
percent) in the company. It was meant to be a confidence booster for the two
men. (d) The three of us believe in the inviolability of friendship. We see it
as a bank account to which you must continue to make deposits so that it can
grow. It is a sacred relationship, a present of unquantifiable value that
you must give to
yourself. So our world view does not include killing your friend for
whatever reason. No reason is good enough for “friend-ticide.” A lot of people
ask us what is the magic behind our strong relationship of almost 40 years. The
answer: friendship. We retired
from Newswatch on May 5, 2011 but we are still together today, why? Friendship.
Since that fateful day of October 19,
1986 our lawyer, Chief
GaniFawehinmi, had made every
effort, using the mechanism of the courts from High Court to the Supreme Court
to bring the suspects to justice. At every turn that resolute and indefatigable
fighter was harassed, assaulted, charged to court on trumped up charges so as
to kill the matter. Every effort was made by the Babangida
government to kill the magazine and render us jobless by the
proscription of the magazine in April 1987 on spurious charges. Our corporate
and personal accounts were frozen. We continued to pursue the assassination
issue with as much vigour as we could. On September 11, 1987 we wrote a
letter to the then Inspector General of Police,
Alhaji Muhammahu Gambo,reminding him about the Dele Giwa
matter. We never got even the
courtesy of a response from Alhaji Gambo. We also appeared at the Oputa
panel with Chief Fawehinmi in Lagos and Abuja in pursuit of justice.
Murder is a criminal matter. Isn’t it
curious, therefore, that people who are accused of murder should seek to run
away from the opportunity to clear their “good names.” We would have thought
they would embrace such an opportunity warmly instead of engaging in legal
gymnastics
Worthy of note is the fact that Alhaji
Abubakar Tsav, the investigating Police Officer, had testified at the Oputa
panel on July 3, 2001 in Abuja. He told the panel that in his interim
report he had recommended that Col.
Halilu Akilu and Lt. Col.
A.K.Togun should be made
available for interrogation and voice identification. He also recommended that
their special privileges should be withdrawn so that a search could be
conducted in their offices and residences for items of evidential value. The
case file was submitted to Mr. Omeben.
He never returned the case file to Mr.
Tsav, nor did he reassign the case to someone else. He simply sat on the
matter until he retired.
Since his retirement Mr. Omeben has
been claiming that we had very powerful links in government
so we were able to block the investigation. This view is quite
flattering but it is patently false. We
had no such influence otherwise we would have blocked the proscription of the
magazine, our serial detentions for spurious reasons, the freezing of our
accounts. Mr. Omeben’s words are aflame with dishonesty. He is evidently a
truth shredder who works as an echo chamber of his sponsors. But truth is like
pregnancy: you can’t hide it for too long.
During the Oputa
panel deliberations in 2001 Ibrahim Babangida, Akilu and Togun went to
court and obtained an order restraining the
Commission from summoning them to appear before it. Justice Oputa said
that the Commission had the power to issue arrest warrants for the trio but
decided against this “in the interest of national reconciliation.”
Murder is a criminal matter. Isn’t it
curious, therefore, that people who are accused of murder should seek to run
away from the opportunity to clear their “good names.” We would have thought
they would embrace such an opportunity warmly instead of engaging in legal
gymnastics.
However, the panel in its report
stated: “As for the case of Dele
Giwa we are of the view that
beyond the legal technicalities that some of the key witnesses clung to, the
federal government should be encouraged to reopen this case for proper investigation.” It stated further: “On
General Ibrahim Babangida, we are of the
view that there is evidence to suggest that he and the two security chiefs,
Brigadier General Halilu Akilu
and Col. A.K.Togun are accountable for the death of Dele Giwa
by letter bomb. We recommend that this case be reopened for further
investigation in the public interest.” We urge the Buhari
government to reopen the matter and ensure that the growing scourge of
assassinations in the country is guillotined.
Source:Vanguard
No comments:
Post a Comment