In
an attemt to checkmate the alledged corruption in the judiciary, the National
Judicial Council, NJC, has barred judges and other court staff from accepting
gifts from other arms of government.
The
move is aimed at enhancing the independence of the judiciary, as it also
outlawed any form of lobbying of other arms of government by the judiciary or
any of its institutions.
The
new measures are also set out to curb corruption and other unethical conduct
among judicial officers and other court staff, especially against the backdrop
of recent raiding of homes and arrest of some Supreme and High Court judges in
the country.
The
existing Code of Conduct for judicial officers provides that “a judge and
members of his/her family shall neither ask for nor accept any gift, bequest,
favour, or loan on account of anything done or omitted to be done by him in the
discharge of his duties. “But, the provision in the new policy particularly
bars judges and other court staff from accepting gifts from other arms of
government, and made compliance mandatory.” Section 2(3)(2) of the new policy
states:
“The
Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers and Code of Conduct for Court Employees,
with the amendment discouraging acceptance of gifts from other arms of
government, should be such as would be adequate. Compliance with their
provisions shall be mandatory.” Further on its relationship with other arms of
government, it is prescribed that “the judiciary shall not resort to lobbying
in ensuring that the legislature and the executive perform their constitutional
responsibilities. “All arms of government should respect the doctrine of
Separation of Powers as enshrined in the Constitution.” The policy also
introduced measures to further keep complaints against judges and other court
staff from the media and public domain. Provisions in this regard are contained
in section 2(2)(4) to 2(2)(9). It states further: “It shall be the policy of
the judiciary on complaints of misconduct against judicial officers or
employees of the judiciary shall not be leaked or published in the media.
“Where complaints on allegations against judicial officers and court employees
are submitted for investigation, the complainant or complainants shall be made
to give an undertaking not to do anything to prejudice investigation or actions
that may be taken. “The institutions of the judiciary concerned with
investigation or/and implementation of decisions taken on such complaints shall
be obliged to cease further action where such complaints are leaked or
discussed in the media. “Where such a leakage is occasioned after the
submission of a complaint, then all investigations on the complaints shall be
suspended, the leakage investigated and if such leakage is from the complainant
or through other parties known to such a complainant, such a complaint should
be discarded. “Where such leakage is occasioned prior to the presentation of
the complaint and the source of the leakage is found to be the complainant or through
other parties known to and connected with the complainant, then such complaint
shall not be accepted, upon submission, by the appropriate disciplinary body.
“On conclusion of investiga-tion, the disciplinary bodies may allow public
disclosure of their findings, subject to following the proper channels.”
No comments:
Post a Comment